User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 8:

:: The 9-digit rule is nothing other than an extended 8-digit rule. With octave-reduced fractions, cases are possible with 5-digit nominators with a <code>1</code> as leading digit. In my opinion, the comma tables on the EDO pages are overloaded anyway. There all the information we have about commas is repeated, I assume that most of this information is obtained by copying from other pages, so there could be a number of errors to correct multiple times. And this tendency will rather increase if we don't push back this kind of duplicates. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

::: I agree the comma tables in edo pages are overloaded. What should be there and what should not, then? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:15, 10 January 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Fractions vs. names in interval lemmas: re ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:25, 11 January 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,888 edits →Fractions vs. names in interval lemmas: re Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:: The 9-digit rule is nothing other than an extended 8-digit rule. With octave-reduced fractions, cases are possible with 5-digit nominators with a <code>1</code> as leading digit. In my opinion, the comma tables on the EDO pages are overloaded anyway. There all the information we have about commas is repeated, I assume that most of this information is obtained by copying from other pages, so there could be a number of errors to correct multiple times. And this tendency will rather increase if we don't push back this kind of duplicates. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)		:: The 9-digit rule is nothing other than an extended 8-digit rule. With octave-reduced fractions, cases are possible with 5-digit nominators with a <code>1</code> as leading digit. In my opinion, the comma tables on the EDO pages are overloaded anyway. There all the information we have about commas is repeated, I assume that most of this information is obtained by copying from other pages, so there could be a number of errors to correct multiple times. And this tendency will rather increase if we don't push back this kind of duplicates. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 17:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

			::: I agree the comma tables in edo pages are overloaded. What should be there and what should not, then? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)