Arseniiv (talk | contribs)
Away for a while: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Away for a while: Get well soon! :) Some reading stuff meanwhile ;)
Line 40: Line 40:


If you don't mind please don't do hard recategorization work by hand for a week. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 11:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC) [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 11:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
If you don't mind please don't do hard recategorization work by hand for a week. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 11:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC) [[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 11:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
: I wish you get well soon!
: Concerning bots: Of course, it would be practical to have a bot available (because there are things that tire human editors, but which are nevertheless indispensable). However, I find rather undemanding works a welcome opportunity to actually read the pages I am about to edit. In this way, I sometimes discover texts that are completely incomprehensible to readers, sometimes even those that I have written myself - reading is as important as writing.
: Bots help in formally clear situations, but when are situations formally clear?
: To avoid misunderstandings: I consider myself to be a technically gifted person, I have been programming with passion for decades, but I have learned that interpersonal problems are often not solved when you "throw technical solutions at them". Wikis in particular are strongly influenced by interpersonal interactions, they are ultimately the lasting traces of this interaction. So if something is wrong in a wiki, it is different than if something is wrong with a document, for example. Therefore it needs wise consideration when to use technical tools. At least that's what my fifteen years of wiki experience tells me. And yes, it is only a part of the truth. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)