Template talk:Infobox interval: Difference between revisions
m →Auto-applying a category?: wrong indent |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
We have some intervals with high p-limits. The <code>Monzo</code> value sometimes tend to explode the frame and its informational value is questionable (who really wants to count all the zeros)? The best would be to make (<code>Ratio</code> or <code>Monzo</code>) mandatory but I doubt that a really great implementation will be possible. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | We have some intervals with high p-limits. The <code>Monzo</code> value sometimes tend to explode the frame and its informational value is questionable (who really wants to count all the zeros)? The best would be to make (<code>Ratio</code> or <code>Monzo</code>) mandatory but I doubt that a really great implementation will be possible. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Maybe allow writing something like <code>large</code> as a value for it, and that won’t add [[:Category:Todo:add interval monzo]] but neither it would show that row. --[[User:Arseniiv|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv|talk]]) 19:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:14, 7 November 2020
Parameter name normalization
it's better to have unique parameter names, so the alternative forms given earlier are now revoked. Pages that make use of them are automatically collected in Category:Todo:normalize interval parameters and should be adjusted from time to time. --Xenwolf (talk) 12:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Auto-applying a category?
Should this template also insert e. g. [[Category:Interval]]
into page text, is it a good idea? --Arseniiv (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, in principle, but I'm not clear what the best category (or categories) should be. We have so far mostly: Interval, Interval ratio, Ratio, I also think that the prime limit could (better: should) be added to the parameters: it's applicable in every case and never goes beyond the limits (as monzos do sometimes see 71-limit). --Xenwolf (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Monzo better optional?
We have some intervals with high p-limits. The Monzo
value sometimes tend to explode the frame and its informational value is questionable (who really wants to count all the zeros)? The best would be to make (Ratio
or Monzo
) mandatory but I doubt that a really great implementation will be possible. --Xenwolf (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe allow writing something like
large
as a value for it, and that won’t add Category:Todo:add interval monzo but neither it would show that row. --Arseniiv (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)