Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 20:34, 13 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:57, 13 October 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →My Second Idea for a Notation System: re? Newer edit →
Line 142:		Line 142:

	:::: A number of them are indeed already there- the natural, the sharp, the flat, the double sharp and the double flat. We'd need to remake the quartertone accidentals as per my descriptions of them during the course of this conversation, with the end result being that instead of there being nine main accidentals in the first box, there would be thirteen accidentals total. Furthermore, we can derive at least four of the accidentals for the second box directly from the syntonic arrows of HEJI- albeit they need to be larger- so that's pretty simple. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)		:::: A number of them are indeed already there- the natural, the sharp, the flat, the double sharp and the double flat. We'd need to remake the quartertone accidentals as per my descriptions of them during the course of this conversation, with the end result being that instead of there being nine main accidentals in the first box, there would be thirteen accidentals total. Furthermore, we can derive at least four of the accidentals for the second box directly from the syntonic arrows of HEJI- albeit they need to be larger- so that's pretty simple. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:34, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

			::::: Why exactly do we need different quartertone accidentals? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 20:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)