Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 20:14, 13 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:17, 13 October 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →My Second Idea for a Notation System: re Newer edit →
Line 138:		Line 138:

	:: At present, I'm thinking there should probably be two- one to hold both the classic and quartertone accidentals, and one to hold accidentals which modify by combinations of the syntonic comma and the rastma. With the syntonic comma modifiers being simultaneously separated from the classic and quartertone accidentals and combined with the rastmic modifiers to form single glyphs, that renders a total of 25 different glyphs as opposed to the 45 in the first system. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)		:: At present, I'm thinking there should probably be two- one to hold both the classic and quartertone accidentals, and one to hold accidentals which modify by combinations of the syntonic comma and the rastma. With the syntonic comma modifiers being simultaneously separated from the classic and quartertone accidentals and combined with the rastmic modifiers to form single glyphs, that renders a total of 25 different glyphs as opposed to the 45 in the first system. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

			::: So the glyphs for the first box are already there? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 20:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)