Talk:Quartismic family: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:40, 12 September 2020 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 3,990 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:55, 12 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:: BTW the @ sign doesn't work to tag me. Next time post on my user page or ask me on Facebook. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 06:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)		:: BTW the @ sign doesn't work to tag me. Next time post on my user page or ask me on Facebook. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 06:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

			::: Truth be told, the first paragraph only lists examples, and there are already eight examples listed. Nevertheless, thank you for pointing out that 25, 45, and 67 are also Quartismic EDOs. Oh, and does it make sense to make the full 2.3.5.7.11 temperament the base temperament and to separate the data on the no-fives version into its own subsection? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 13:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)