Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:32, 7 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:59, 8 September 2020 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,308 edits re Newer edit →
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:::: Okay, I've managed to confirm that 159edo is ''not'' consistent in the 19-odd limit as the difference between the best 17/16 and the best 19/16 is 25 steps, while the best 19/17 is 26 steps... Not good at all... Looks like I need to search for several new values for step sizes --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)		:::: Okay, I've managed to confirm that 159edo is ''not'' consistent in the 19-odd limit as the difference between the best 17/16 and the best 19/16 is 25 steps, while the best 19/17 is 26 steps... Not good at all... Looks like I need to search for several new values for step sizes --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

			::::: Afaik no edo between 94 and 282 is fully consistent in 23-limit. There's 111, 149 and 217 fully consistent in 19-limit. 94 is special consistency-wise but it's not superior in accuracy, so not all edos above 94 need to directly compare with it, especially when there's nothing to relate them. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 02:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)