User talk:PiotrGrochowski: Difference between revisions

Line 55:

Hi Piotr, just saw you added a bunch of patent val mappings to the EDO pages. This is very good information to have. It is also a good reference to have the "direct" mappings, even if inconsistent - we use these a lot for generating subgroup mappings, so I've added both to each page. There is also the concept of the "best" mapping using generalized patent vals - I don't know if that is on the wiki yet, but it would be good to add if not. [[User:Battaglia01|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Battaglia01|talk]]) 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

: Do you like https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/247892491/? I can't easily reprogram it to use the closest matches instead of patent ones though, as the project calculates the errors for 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 (9 and 15 from the patent val), and it's hardwired so that each fraction has been given a text fraction pair and a code, e.g. 15 standing for "add the error for 3, subtract the error for 11" for 12/11, 11/6. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 18:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

: Do you like https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/247892491/? I can't easily reprogram it to use the closest matches instead of patent ones though, as the project calculates the errors for 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 (9 and 15 from the patent val), and it's hardwired so that each fraction has been given a text fraction pair and a code, e.g. the code 15 standing for "add the error for 3, subtract the error for 11" for 12/11, 11/6 (1=3, 2=5, 3=7, 4=9, 5=11, 6=13, 7=15). [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 18:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:27, 22 September 2018 view source PiotrGrochowski (talk \| contribs) 981 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:28, 22 September 2018 view source PiotrGrochowski (talk \| contribs) 981 edits →Patent val mappings and direct mappings - using both Newer edit →
Line 55:		Line 55:

	Hi Piotr, just saw you added a bunch of patent val mappings to the EDO pages. This is very good information to have. It is also a good reference to have the "direct" mappings, even if inconsistent - we use these a lot for generating subgroup mappings, so I've added both to each page. There is also the concept of the "best" mapping using generalized patent vals - I don't know if that is on the wiki yet, but it would be good to add if not. [[User:Battaglia01\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Battaglia01\|talk]]) 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)		Hi Piotr, just saw you added a bunch of patent val mappings to the EDO pages. This is very good information to have. It is also a good reference to have the "direct" mappings, even if inconsistent - we use these a lot for generating subgroup mappings, so I've added both to each page. There is also the concept of the "best" mapping using generalized patent vals - I don't know if that is on the wiki yet, but it would be good to add if not. [[User:Battaglia01\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Battaglia01\|talk]]) 18:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
	: Do you like https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/247892491/? I can't easily reprogram it to use the closest matches instead of patent ones though, as the project calculates the errors for 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 (9 and 15 from the patent val), and it's hardwired so that each fraction has been given a text fraction pair and a code, e.g. 15 standing for "add the error for 3, subtract the error for 11" for 12/11, 11/6. [[User:PiotrGrochowski\|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski\|talk]]) 18:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)		: Do you like https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/247892491/? I can't easily reprogram it to use the closest matches instead of patent ones though, as the project calculates the errors for 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 (9 and 15 from the patent val), and it's hardwired so that each fraction has been given a text fraction pair and a code, e.g. the code 15 standing for "add the error for 3, subtract the error for 11" for 12/11, 11/6 (1=3, 2=5, 3=7, 4=9, 5=11, 6=13, 7=15). [[User:PiotrGrochowski\|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski\|talk]]) 18:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)