Talk:Septischismic family: Difference between revisions
Hotcrystal0 (talk | contribs) add an actual title |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
:::: Wild guesses on the poll's accuracy will not help. In case it's unclear, the poll was closed after 7 days since the 3rd vote, which is how we always did it. There's no precedent of a necessary further delay. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC) | :::: Wild guesses on the poll's accuracy will not help. In case it's unclear, the poll was closed after 7 days since the 3rd vote, which is how we always did it. There's no precedent of a necessary further delay. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:06, 20 September 2026 (UTC) | ||
==Bad process== | == Bad process == | ||
By the way, for the record, I do not disagree with the new name, but rather the process used to decide that new name. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC) | By the way, for the record, I do not disagree with the new name, but rather the process used to decide that new name. <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 19:44, 22 September 2026 (UTC) | ||
| Line 130: | Line 129: | ||
== Rename androschismic? == | == Rename androschismic? == | ||
The old names of some of the temps in this family listed followed a clear corresponsence with temps in the garibaldi family, specifically: | The old names of some of the temps in this family listed followed a clear corresponsence with temps in the garibaldi family, specifically: | ||
| Line 138: | Line 136: | ||
So, should we rename androschismic to disassociate with andromeda to maintain consistency, or perhaps another reason? <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 22:04, 22 September 2026 (UTC) | So, should we rename androschismic to disassociate with andromeda to maintain consistency, or perhaps another reason? <span style="display: inline-block;transform: rotate(15deg);background:#E1EBF2;font-family:Verdana;text-shadow: 3px 3px 4px #0008;">[[User:Hotcrystal0|hotcrysta]][[User talk: Hotcrystal0|l0]]</span> 22:04, 22 September 2026 (UTC) | ||
: See the reason for the rename I cited in the reply to Godtone. It's not about disassociation. I think we've agreed earlier that the association with garibaldi isn't a problem to begin with. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:46, 23 September 2026 (UTC) | |||