1080edo: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m Text replacement - "[[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #" to "[[Riemann zeta function #" |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
1080 is a largely composite edo, meaning it is notable for its divisors. Its 32 [[number of the divisors|divisors]] are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 24, 27, 30, 36, 40, 45, 54, 60, 72, 90, 108, 120, 135, 180, 216, 270, 360, 540, and 1080. 1080's abundancy index is 2.33…, or exactly 7/3. | 1080 is a largely composite edo, meaning it is notable for its divisors. Its 32 [[number of the divisors|divisors]] are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 24, 27, 30, 36, 40, 45, 54, 60, 72, 90, 108, 120, 135, 180, 216, 270, 360, 540, and 1080. 1080's abundancy index is 2.33…, or exactly 7/3. | ||
Notable subsets of 1080edo are [[270edo]] and [[72edo]], as they both belong to the [[ | Notable subsets of 1080edo are [[270edo]] and [[72edo]], as they both belong to the [[Riemann zeta function #Zeta EDO lists|zeta peak edos, zeta integral edos and zeta gap edos]]. However, the [[patent val]] of 1080edo does not consist of their approximation alone, as the 17th harmonic comes from [[540edo]]. In addition, [[12edo]] is the dominant tuning system in the world, and [[360edo]] is a highly composite edo. | ||
As every 4th step of [[4320edo]], it is a good tuning for the 2.5/3.7 subgroup, and has strong representation for [[19/12]], [[19/10]], [[17/13]], [[23/13]], and [[23/17]]. | As every 4th step of [[4320edo]], it is a good tuning for the 2.5/3.7 subgroup, and has strong representation for [[19/12]], [[19/10]], [[17/13]], [[23/13]], and [[23/17]]. | ||