Factor 9 grid: Difference between revisions

Line 6:

More precisely, the "Factor 9 grid" refers to a specific mode of [[14ado]] whose tonic is placed on the step corresponding to 432 Hz and its octave equivalents, such as 216 Hz or 864 Hz, which is the 11th step of 14ado itself. It is this particular modal alignment that is commonly associated with "A = 432 Hz" conspiracy theories, where the emphasis is placed on organizing the scale around 432 Hz as a tonic.

Proponents of the "Factor 9 grid" manly present it as the more consonant or acoustically "healthier" alternative to the prevailing [[12edo|12-tone equal temperament]], often accompanied by references to the symbolic or "~~sacred”~~ significance of the number 12. However, descriptions of the scale, as they are presented in the video, contain several internal inconsistencies. The underlying structure of the grid, as mentioned above, corresponds to [[14ado]], which by definition contains 14 distinct steps per octave rather than 12, thus conflicting with the initial claims that the scale is 12-note or is a replacement for 12edo.

Proponents of the "Factor 9 grid" manly present it as the more consonant or acoustically "healthier" alternative to the prevailing [[12edo|12-tone equal temperament]], often accompanied by references to the symbolic or "sacred1 significance of the number 12. However, descriptions of the scale, as they are presented in the video, contain several internal inconsistencies. The underlying structure of the grid, as mentioned above, corresponds to [[14ado]], which by definition contains 14 distinct steps per octave rather than 12, thus conflicting with the initial claims that the scale is 12-note or is a replacement for 12edo.

Furthermore, in the cited material, the sequence appears to omit the frequency 243 Hz (and its octave equivalents), despite it being a member of arithmetic progression that constitutes the scale. This omission appears to be motivated by an attempt to align the number of pitches with the 12-note framework of standard Western notation, as the presentation maps the resulting tones onto conventional note names. However, the rationale for excluding specifically 243 Hz and its octave displacement, as opposed to any other member of the sequence, is not explicitly addressed. No criteria are provided for why this particular step is removed while the remaining tones are retained, leaving the adjustment unexplained within the context of the scale’s stated arithmetic construction.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 More precisely, the "Factor 9 grid" refers to a specific mode of [[14ado]] whose tonic is placed on the step corresponding to 432 Hz and its octave equivalents, such as 216 Hz or 864 Hz, which is the 11th step of 14ado itself. It is this particular modal alignment that is commonly associated with "A = 432 Hz" conspiracy theories, where the emphasis is placed on organizing the scale around 432 Hz as a tonic.
-Proponents of the "Factor 9 grid" manly present it as the more consonant or acoustically "healthier" alternative to the prevailing [[12edo|12-tone equal temperament]], often accompanied by references to the symbolic or "sacred” significance of the number 12. However, descriptions of the scale, as they are presented in the video, contain several internal inconsistencies. The underlying structure of the grid, as mentioned above, corresponds to [[14ado]], which by definition contains 14 distinct steps per octave rather than 12, thus conflicting with the initial claims that the scale is 12-note or is a replacement for 12edo.
+Proponents of the "Factor 9 grid" manly present it as the more consonant or acoustically "healthier" alternative to the prevailing [[12edo|12-tone equal temperament]], often accompanied by references to the symbolic or "sacred1 significance of the number 12. However, descriptions of the scale, as they are presented in the video, contain several internal inconsistencies. The underlying structure of the grid, as mentioned above, corresponds to [[14ado]], which by definition contains 14 distinct steps per octave rather than 12, thus conflicting with the initial claims that the scale is 12-note or is a replacement for 12edo.
 Furthermore, in the cited material, the sequence appears to omit the frequency 243 Hz (and its octave equivalents), despite it being a member of arithmetic progression that constitutes the scale. This omission appears to be motivated by an attempt to align the number of pitches with the 12-note framework of standard Western notation, as the presentation maps the resulting tones onto conventional note names. However, the rationale for excluding specifically 243 Hz and its octave displacement, as opposed to any other member of the sequence, is not explicitly addressed. No criteria are provided for why this particular step is removed while the remaining tones are retained, leaving the adjustment unexplained within the context of the scale’s stated arithmetic construction.