Talk:4:5:6: Difference between revisions
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:::: --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 15:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC) | :::: --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 15:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
::::: It's not purely arbitrary. It has stylistic aspects but there's a good psychoacoustic basis too. Octave equivalence is real. Rootedness and virtual fundamentals are real. They have effects on the sound besides the numbers. Say they don't exist and you're into your fantasyland. | |||
::::: In practice everyone would agree 4:5:6 and 1:3:5 are voicings of the same chord. Otherwise we would need to make distinct articles for each of them. | |||
::::: I knew what ''<nowiki>'3</nowiki>'', ''<nowiki>'5</nowiki>'', etc. meant. You don't need to explain it to me. You need to explain it to users, by adding a note to the table or something like that. | |||
::::: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC) | |||