Talk:Subgroup temperament families, relationships, and genes: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:


:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
== "Gene" vs step of 311? ==
Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:16, 28 June 2025

Confusion about rank of a gene

"The dimension or rank of a gene is simply its rank as a temperament (which is one less than the rank of the subgroup is being tempered from)"

I don't understand the part in parentheses here. Why is it one less? —Keenan Pepper (talk) 21:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Because it tempers out one comma? FloraC (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited Mike Battaglia (talk) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

"Gene" vs step of 311?

Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- VectorGraphics (talk) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)