Delta-rational chord: Difference between revisions

ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
m Least-squares error: Oops, «nowrap» isn't supposed to go inside LaTeX math
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 48: Line 48:
<math>\displaystyle{r_{\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}}(x) = \frac{E^{v_p}x^{v_g}- E^{u_p}x^{u_g}}{E^{u_p}x^{u_g} - 1} }.</math>
<math>\displaystyle{r_{\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}}(x) = \frac{E^{v_p}x^{v_g}- E^{u_p}x^{u_g}}{E^{u_p}x^{u_g} - 1} }.</math>


Then, provided that the positive rational number <math>m/n</math> lies in the image <math>r_{\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}}(I),</math> we can solve for the frequency ratio <math>g \in I</math> that satisfies <math>r_{\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}}(g) = m/n,</math> making the specified chord {{nowrap|('''0''', '''u''', '''v''') a + ''n'' + ''m''}} DR chord.
Then, provided that the positive rational number <math>m/n</math> lies in the image <math>r_{\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}}(I)</math> and yields a nondegenerate equation, we can solve for the frequency ratio <math>g \in I</math> that satisfies <math>r_{\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}}(g) = m/n,</math> making the specified chord {{nowrap|('''0''', '''u''', '''v''') a + ''n'' + ''m''}} DR chord.


The existence of an exact tuning for a delta signature specification is only guaranteed to hold when we only care about a ratio between ''two'' terms in the delta signature being exact. If we want to optimize an arbitrary specified delta signature (with some deltas possibly held free), we can use a least-squares-error solution instead to minimize the error.
The existence of an exact tuning for a delta signature specification is only guaranteed to hold when we only care about a ratio between ''two'' terms in the delta signature being exact. If we want to optimize an arbitrary specified delta signature (with some deltas possibly held free), we can use a least-squares-error solution instead to minimize the error.