Shibboleth family: Difference between revisions

Xenllium (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 13: Line 13:
[[POTE generator]]: ~6/5 = 321.852
[[POTE generator]]: ~6/5 = 321.852


{{Val list|legend=1| 15, 26, 41, 179c, 220c, 261cc, 302cc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 26, 41, 179c, 220c, 261cc, 302cc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.227553
[[Badness]]: 0.227553
Line 31: Line 31:
[[POTE generator]]: ~6/5 = 321.930
[[POTE generator]]: ~6/5 = 321.930


{{Val list|legend=1| 11c, 15, 26, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11c, 15, 26, 41 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.047932
[[Badness]]: 0.047932
Line 44: Line 44:
POTE generator: ~6/5 = 321.847
POTE generator: ~6/5 = 321.847


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 11c, 15, 26, 41, 179cde, 220cde, 261ccdee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11c, 15, 26, 41, 179cde, 220cde, 261ccdee }}


Badness: 0.025659
Badness: 0.025659
Line 57: Line 57:
POTE generator: ~6/5 = 321.994
POTE generator: ~6/5 = 321.994


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 11cf, 15, 26, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cf, 15, 26, 41 }}


Badness: 0.021478
Badness: 0.021478
Line 72: Line 72:
[[POTE generator]]: ~6/5 = 321.423
[[POTE generator]]: ~6/5 = 321.423


{{Val list|legend=1| 11cd, 15, 41dd, 56dd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 11cd, 15, 41dd, 56dd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.115292
[[Badness]]: 0.115292