10/9: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Plumtree (talk | contribs)
m Normalising usage of Infobox Interval
Names
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Interval
{{Infobox Interval
| Name = small whole tone
| Name = small whole tone, classic(al) whole tone, ptolemaic whole tone
| Color name = y2, yo 2nd
| Color name = y2, yo 2nd
| Sound = jid_10_9_pluck_adu_dr220.mp3
| Sound = jid_10_9_pluck_adu_dr220.mp3
Line 6: Line 6:
{{Wikipedia|Major second}}
{{Wikipedia|Major second}}


In [[5-limit]] [[just intonation]], '''10/9''' is a '''small whole tone''' of about 182.4¢. It is a [[superparticular]] interval, as you can find it in the harmonic series between the 9th and the 10th overtones. It is one of two essential whole tones in the 5-limit; the other one is [[9/8]] (about 203.9¢), which is [[81/80]] (about 21.5¢) higher than 10/9. 9/8 is an octave-reduced overtone, and it is closer to [[12edo]]'s single whole step of 200¢. Thus, 9/8 is more familiar and less difficult to tune by ear than 10/9.
In [[5-limit]] [[just intonation]], '''10/9''' is the '''small''', '''classic(al)''', or '''ptolemaic whole tone'''<ref>For reference, see [[5/4]]. </ref> of about 182.4¢. It is a [[superparticular]] interval, as you can find it in the harmonic series between the 9th and the 10th overtones. It is one of two essential whole tones in the 5-limit; the other one is [[9/8]] (about 203.9¢), which is [[81/80]] (about 21.5¢) higher than 10/9. 9/8 is an octave-reduced overtone, and it is closer to [[12edo]]'s single whole step of 200¢. Thus, 9/8 is more familiar and less difficult to tune by ear than 10/9.


The first three notes of a JI major scale – 1/1, 9/8, 5/4 – move by a step of 9/8 followed by a step of 10/9 (or alternatively 1/1, 10/9, 5/4 – move by a step of 10/9 followed by a step of 9/8). In systems where 81/80 is tempered out (in 12edo, [[19edo]], [[31edo]] and other [[meantone]] systems) that distinction is lost and this sounds like two equal-sized steps. In strict JI, the difference may be hard to notice at first.
The first three notes of a JI major scale – 1/1, 9/8, 5/4 – move by a step of 9/8 followed by a step of 10/9 (or alternatively 1/1, 10/9, 5/4 – move by a step of 10/9 followed by a step of 9/8). In systems where 81/80 is tempered out (in 12edo, [[19edo]], [[31edo]] and other [[meantone]] systems) that distinction is lost and this sounds like two equal-sized steps. In strict JI, the difference may be hard to notice at first.
Line 16: Line 16:
* [[6/5]] – its [[fourth complement]]
* [[6/5]] – its [[fourth complement]]
* [[Gallery of just intervals]]
* [[Gallery of just intervals]]
== Notes ==
<references/>


[[Category:Second]]
[[Category:Second]]
[[Category:Whole tone]]
[[Category:Whole tone]]

Revision as of 12:35, 12 January 2023

Interval information
Ratio 10/9
Factorization 2 × 3-2 × 5
Monzo [1 -2 1
Size in cents 182.4037¢
Names small whole tone,
classic(al) whole tone,
ptolemaic whole tone
Color name y2, yo 2nd
FJS name [math]\displaystyle{ \text{M2}^{5} }[/math]
Special properties superparticular,
reduced
Tenney height (log2 nd) 6.49185
Weil height (log2 max(n, d)) 6.64386
Wilson height (sopfr(nd)) 13

[sound info]
Open this interval in xen-calc
English Wikipedia has an article on:

In 5-limit just intonation, 10/9 is the small, classic(al), or ptolemaic whole tone[1] of about 182.4¢. It is a superparticular interval, as you can find it in the harmonic series between the 9th and the 10th overtones. It is one of two essential whole tones in the 5-limit; the other one is 9/8 (about 203.9¢), which is 81/80 (about 21.5¢) higher than 10/9. 9/8 is an octave-reduced overtone, and it is closer to 12edo's single whole step of 200¢. Thus, 9/8 is more familiar and less difficult to tune by ear than 10/9.

The first three notes of a JI major scale – 1/1, 9/8, 5/4 – move by a step of 9/8 followed by a step of 10/9 (or alternatively 1/1, 10/9, 5/4 – move by a step of 10/9 followed by a step of 9/8). In systems where 81/80 is tempered out (in 12edo, 19edo, 31edo and other meantone systems) that distinction is lost and this sounds like two equal-sized steps. In strict JI, the difference may be hard to notice at first.

See also

Notes

  1. For reference, see 5/4.