Talk:Monzo: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) |
Dummy index (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:::::: It doesn't address my concern, that is, readability. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | :::::: It doesn't address my concern, that is, readability. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
::::: (See [[Val #Vals in JI subgroups]] on how to write subgroup monzos.) I want to write more compact, unless we want to consider about subgroup actively. How is {{monzo|<sub>2</sub>-4 <sub>19</sub>1}} ? (Of course as a temporary way of writing) --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 13:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | ::::: (See [[Val #Vals in JI subgroups]] on how to write subgroup monzos.) I want to write more compact<ins>ly</ins>, unless we want to consider about subgroup actively. How is {{monzo|<sub>2</sub>-4 <sub>19</sub>1}} ? (Of course as a temporary way of writing) --[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 13:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::::: It is too much as it is prime factorization. I feel it is better to include first 4 items without subscript 2, 3, 5 and 7. {{monzo|-4 0 0 0 <sub>19</sub>1}}, {{monzo|0 0 0 0 <sub>23</sub>-1 <sub>29</sub>1}}.--[[User:Dummy index|Dummy index]] ([[User talk:Dummy index|talk]]) 14:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | |||