Talk:Breed: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Godtone (talk | contribs)
comment on new sense of "breed" and whether a disambiguation here is really the right choice
Line 6: Line 6:


:: I added the tag to it (formatting is todo). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
:: I added the tag to it (formatting is todo). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 08:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
== Who uses this term and what does it even mean? ==
First time I've seen this. It says it's a "specific type of val" but does not specify what the difference between a breed and a val is. The linked yahoo archive suggests it's supposed to be an alternate word for val... is that correct? If so it should be stated. I'm also not sure that the rename "Breed family" -> "Breed (temperament)" makes sense either; the former feels clearly more correct, and it seems like this dubious-seeming page is the only point against that state of affairs... --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 17:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 11 November 2024

Disambiguate?

Maybe this should be a disambiguation page between the temperament and type of val? I'm not sure whether either one warrants prominence. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

My take: the type of val is of more prominence; temperament names are somewhat arbitrary and less important. FloraC (talk) 07:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
I added the tag to it (formatting is todo). --Xenwolf (talk) 08:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Who uses this term and what does it even mean?

First time I've seen this. It says it's a "specific type of val" but does not specify what the difference between a breed and a val is. The linked yahoo archive suggests it's supposed to be an alternate word for val... is that correct? If so it should be stated. I'm also not sure that the rename "Breed family" -> "Breed (temperament)" makes sense either; the former feels clearly more correct, and it seems like this dubious-seeming page is the only point against that state of affairs... --Godtone (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)