User talk:FloraC/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
→EDOs vs. Vals: new section |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::: Just roughly. To my eyes the current design works okay, and if it's to be improved, I'm not fond of the colored background against the text. Anyway, I'll try making a template for this. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: Just roughly. To my eyes the current design works okay, and if it's to be improved, I'm not fond of the colored background against the text. Anyway, I'll try making a template for this. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
== EDOs vs. Vals == | |||
I see [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=User%3AFloraC%2FSandbox&type=revision&diff=61122&oldid=61009 your point]. I know that the "[[warts]]" notation is a shorthand for [[val]]s. I think we should branch a [[Template:Vals]] for that. There are places where we already (and will further) use EDOs. In temperament properties we should switch from EDOs to Vals and at the same time prepare EDO pages to mitigate confusion. Until now there is (to my knowledge) no EDO page with a "Vals" section. The page [[val]] itself is also not ready to "catch" an in-going link that should be descriptive for an enumeration of EDOs/vals. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:52, 3 February 2021
Collapsible elements
I find it not optimal to have expand links displayed without visual connection to the text (standing lonely in the nowhere). What about adding some border (maybe background as well) to the collapsible/expandable divs? --Xenwolf (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Instead of adding/discussing isolated CSS features, let's have a look at Wikipedia: Musical tuning #Further reading. Would you agree that we should aim for a design that is roughly equivalent to what Wikipedia has to offer? --Xenwolf (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
EDOs vs. Vals
I see your point. I know that the "warts" notation is a shorthand for vals. I think we should branch a Template:Vals for that. There are places where we already (and will further) use EDOs. In temperament properties we should switch from EDOs to Vals and at the same time prepare EDO pages to mitigate confusion. Until now there is (to my knowledge) no EDO page with a "Vals" section. The page val itself is also not ready to "catch" an in-going link that should be descriptive for an enumeration of EDOs/vals. --Xenwolf (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)