|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
| | The 1920 division divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean_temperament_measures#TE simple badness|relative error]], only [[1578edo|1578]] and [[1889edo|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[Interval_size_measure|interval size measure]]. |
| This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
| |
| : This revision was by author [[User:genewardsmith|genewardsmith]] and made on <tt>2015-08-17 12:55:32 UTC</tt>.<br>
| |
| : The original revision id was <tt>556814183</tt>.<br>
| |
| : The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
| |
| The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
| |
| <h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
| |
| <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">The 1920 division divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean temperament measures#TE simple badness|relative error]], only [[1578edo|1578]] and [[1889edo|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[interval size measure]].
| |
|
| |
|
| 1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[12edo|12]], [[15edo|15]], [[16edo|16]], [[24edo|24]], [[60edo|60]], [[80edo|80]], [[96edo|96]], [[128edo|128]], [[240edo|240]], [[320edo|320]] and [[640edo|640]].</pre></div> | | 1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[12edo|12]], [[15edo|15]], [[16edo|16]], [[24edo|24]], [[60edo|60]], [[80edo|80]], [[96edo|96]], [[128edo|128]], [[240edo|240]], [[320edo|320]] and [[640edo|640]]. |
| <h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
| |
| <div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html"><html><head><title>1920edo</title></head><body>The 1920 division divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit <a class="wiki_link" href="/Tenney-Euclidean%20temperament%20measures#TE simple badness">relative error</a>, only <a class="wiki_link" href="/1578edo">1578</a> and <a class="wiki_link" href="/1889edo">1889</a> are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for <a class="wiki_link" href="/interval%20size%20measure">interval size measure</a>.<br />
| |
| <br />
| |
| 1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are <a class="wiki_link" href="/10edo">10</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/12edo">12</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/15edo">15</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo">16</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/24edo">24</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/60edo">60</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/80edo">80</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/96edo">96</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/128edo">128</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/240edo">240</a>, <a class="wiki_link" href="/320edo">320</a> and <a class="wiki_link" href="/640edo">640</a>.</body></html></pre></div>
| |
The 1920 division divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit relative error, only 1578 and 1889 are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for interval size measure.
1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are 10, 12, 15, 16, 24, 60, 80, 96, 128, 240, 320 and 640.