Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:31, 7 January 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:32, 7 January 2021 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:
	[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 17:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)		[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 17:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

	: How then do you judge inconsistency? I note that [[128/125]], when approached by way of a chain of [[5/4]] intervals doesn't match the step that best fits [[128/125]] directly in terms of absolute error, and I have the same problem with [[49/32]]. I also noted that Mercator's comma is less than half the size of a single step in 159edo, so why is what I said about that entirely wrong? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 17:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)		: How then do you judge inconsistency? I note that [[128/125]], when approached by way of a chain of [[5/4]] intervals doesn't match the step that best fits [[128/125]] directly in terms of absolute error, and I have the same problem with [[49/32]]. I also noted that Mercator's comma is less than half the size of a single step in 159edo, so why is what I said about that entirely wrong? Please do tell. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 17:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)