Talk:318edo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Readability: new todo cat for this |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: I started [[:Category:Todo:improve readability]] for cases like this. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 11:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | :: I started [[:Category:Todo:improve readability]] for cases like this. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 11:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: Unfortunately, I didn't have as many resources for figuring out what commas this EDO tempered out. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:12, 7 January 2021
Readability
There are lots of isolated facts hidden in the text. Why are we forcing people to search for it? Imagine you'd read it aloud to someone else: would this make sense? If not, other options should be evaluated: for example lists, tables, or images. --Xenwolf (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm afraid a lot of other mega-edo pages are written this way, too. FloraC (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, a lot of work on old pages, but we should especially have an eye on newly created pages. Of course, when we now edit old pages (especially for minor fixes) we have to be careful what we leave behind. People tend to get used to things that they see as accepted by others, especially by experienced users. Take 206edo for an example, it's better now but still not good, we should add it in some todo category, but I don't find the right one (rework seems to much, review to little). To get back to this article, I think that enumerations of technical facts should be made obvious as such. --Xenwolf (talk) 11:08, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I started Category:Todo:improve readability for cases like this. --Xenwolf (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)