Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 19:43, 13 October 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →My Second Idea for a Notation System: question ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:13, 13 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,010 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 136:		Line 136:

	: How many glyph boxes will be needed? In the first approach, there was a maximum of two boxes (both of them optional): the first box holds a quartertone (or classic) accidental optionally combined with syntonic commas, the optional second box holds either septimal comma glyphs or darts. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)		: How many glyph boxes will be needed? In the first approach, there was a maximum of two boxes (both of them optional): the first box holds a quartertone (or classic) accidental optionally combined with syntonic commas, the optional second box holds either septimal comma glyphs or darts. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

			:: At present, I'm thinking there should probably be two- one to hold both the classic and quartertone accidentals, and one to hold accidentals which modify by combinations of the syntonic comma and the rastma. With the syntonic comma modifiers separated from the classic and quartertone accidentals but combined with the rastmic modifiers to form single glyphs, that renders a total of 25 different glyphs as opposed to the 45 in the first system. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)