Talk:352/351: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
re |
m →13/11-kleisma: Clarification |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: The reason why it's of significance is that there's a dedicated symbol for 352/351~5120/5103 in [[sagittal notation]], and this is how they call it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC) | : The reason why it's of significance is that there's a dedicated symbol for 352/351~5120/5103 in [[sagittal notation]], and this is how they call it. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Needs to be made clear for future. It should be "11/13-kleisma" as 11 is in the numerator and 13 is in the denominator. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:57, 26 November 2020
13/11-kleisma
How can this name be derived that it's called fairly intuitive? Please help me understand! --Xenwolf (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Fact 1: 352/351 = (32/27)/(13/11). This says it is how much 13/11 deviates from a Pythagorean interval, hence "13/11-kleisma".
- Fact 2: 352/351 = (1053/1024)/(33/32). This says it is the difference between the tridecimal quartertone and undecimal quartertone, hence "13/11-kleisma".
- The reason why it's of significance is that there's a dedicated symbol for 352/351~5120/5103 in sagittal notation, and this is how they call it. FloraC (talk) 08:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)