Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
re
Line 71: Line 71:
== 159edo Interval Chart ==
== 159edo Interval Chart ==
Hey, Flora, I saw the conversation on the discussion page for [[Table_of_159edo_Intervals|Table of 159edo intervals]].  I hope you like what you see now.  I also hope that this chart isn't made shorter after I finish my work- I really want others to see both members of any given pair octave compliments- especially when the more obscure intervals are involved... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Flora, I saw the conversation on the discussion page for [[Table_of_159edo_Intervals|Table of 159edo intervals]].  I hope you like what you see now.  I also hope that this chart isn't made shorter after I finish my work- I really want others to see both members of any given pair octave compliments- especially when the more obscure intervals are involved... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
: That looks very neat. And it need not be shortened to half-octave since it's not in the main edo page, where I reckon spacing is a matter. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)