FloraC
Joined 30 March 2020
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
: The algorithm doesn't miss anything. It's a sequence of edos with ''progressively lower TE error''. 44edo is contorted in the 11-limit, meaning that it's the same as 22, which is outperformed by 24, so it doesn't show up. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC) | : The algorithm doesn't miss anything. It's a sequence of edos with ''progressively lower TE error''. 44edo is contorted in the 11-limit, meaning that it's the same as 22, which is outperformed by 24, so it doesn't show up. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::If the algorithm doesn't miss anything, then I'd like to know why the different runs don't all get the same EDOs... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
I should also point out that when I tried this same test on 46edo, I got "-1" as a result despite 46edo seeming to have the telltale signs of being a quartismic temperament- Talk about inconsistency. For the record, Inthar and I both thought that 46edo was one of these quartismic temperaments- but we were all wrong. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC) | I should also point out that when I tried this same test on 46edo, I got "-1" as a result despite 46edo seeming to have the telltale signs of being a quartismic temperament- Talk about inconsistency. For the record, Inthar and I both thought that 46edo was one of these quartismic temperaments- but we were all wrong. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC) | ||