Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions
re |
m re |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:::: Okay, I've managed to confirm that 159edo is ''not'' consistent in the 19-odd limit as the difference between the best 17/16 and the best 19/16 is 25 steps, while the best 19/17 is 26 steps... Not good at all... Looks like I need to search for several new values for step sizes --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | :::: Okay, I've managed to confirm that 159edo is ''not'' consistent in the 19-odd limit as the difference between the best 17/16 and the best 19/16 is 25 steps, while the best 19/17 is 26 steps... Not good at all... Looks like I need to search for several new values for step sizes --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::: 159edo has two intervals in 29-limit with >50% relative error —- 19/17 and 29/17. That's why you have to decide, full 17-limit or no-17 29-limit. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 03:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
::::: Afaik no edo between 94 and 282 is fully consistent in 23-limit. There's 111, 149 and 217 fully consistent in 19-limit. 94 is special consistency-wise but it's not superior in accuracy, so not all edos above 94 need to directly compare with it, especially when there's nothing to relate them. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC) | ::::: Afaik no edo between 94 and 282 is fully consistent in 23-limit. There's 111, 149 and 217 fully consistent in 19-limit. 94 is special consistency-wise but it's not superior in accuracy, so not all edos above 94 need to directly compare with it, especially when there's nothing to relate them. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC) | ||