Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:21, 7 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:32, 7 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 31:		Line 31:

	:::: I must admit that the main reason I'm interested in whether or not 159edo is consistent up to the 23-limit is because I'm currently compiling a list of Just Intervals corresponding to the various steps in 159edo, and 23 is the highest prime I've had to use so far... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)		:::: I must admit that the main reason I'm interested in whether or not 159edo is consistent up to the 23-limit is because I'm currently compiling a list of Just Intervals corresponding to the various steps in 159edo, and 23 is the highest prime I've had to use so far... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

			:::: Okay, I've managed to confirm that 159edo is ''not'' consistent in the 19-odd limit as the difference between the best 17/16 and the best 19/16 is 25 steps, while the best 19/17 is 26 steps... Not good at all... Looks like I need to search for several new values for step sizes --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 16:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)