Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:: Thanks! Once we do a lot more exploring of 159edo, I hope to put our findings here. After all, there's no way I'm just letting an EDO as useful as this just languish anymore. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 13:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | :: Thanks! Once we do a lot more exploring of 159edo, I hope to put our findings here. After all, there's no way I'm just letting an EDO as useful as this just languish anymore. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 13:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: I have 159edo's patent val for primes up to the 19 limit- {{val|159 252 369 446 550 588 650 675}}. How consistent is this EDO when it comes to this group of primes? (preceding unsigned comment by [[User talk:Aura|talk]]) | :: I have 159edo's patent val for primes up to the 19 limit- {{val|159 252 369 446 550 588 650 675}}. How consistent is this EDO when it comes to this group of primes? (preceding unsigned comment by [[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) | ||
:::According to Scala it's only consistent up to 17-odd limit. It might still be consistent when we add some higher odd numbers, though. [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 15:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | :::According to Scala it's only consistent up to 17-odd limit. It might still be consistent when we add some higher odd numbers, though. [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 15:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | ||