User talk:Inthar: Difference between revisions

Line 66:

:: I see that 70 is 48 + 22, and from the looks of things, 70edo seems to work... Hmm... if 22 is actually the independent number rather than 46, then that means that 68edo should also work as it is 2*22 + 24... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

:: I can confirm from my calculation that 68edo is a very good quartismic EDO... This means that the quartismic EDOs are actually all of the form 22A + 24B + 159C... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:14, 7 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:20, 7 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 66:		Line 66:

	:: I see that 70 is 48 + 22, and from the looks of things, 70edo seems to work... Hmm... if 22 is actually the independent number rather than 46, then that means that 68edo should also work as it is 2*22 + 24... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)		:: I see that 70 is 48 + 22, and from the looks of things, 70edo seems to work... Hmm... if 22 is actually the independent number rather than 46, then that means that 68edo should also work as it is 2*22 + 24... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

			:: I can confirm from my calculation that 68edo is a very good quartismic EDO... This means that the quartismic EDOs are actually all of the form 22A + 24B + 159C... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)