User talk:Inthar: Difference between revisions

Line 59:

:: So you can use differences between the defining EDOs for this as well... What's more, the patent vals of 22edo confirm your finding... Nice... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

:: With that in mind, I'm guessing that we can expect 48edo, 50edo, 70edo, 72edo, 92edo and 96edo to also be quartismic EDOs, right?

:: With that in mind, I'm guessing that we can expect 48edo, 50edo, 70edo, 72edo, 92edo and 96edo to also be quartismic EDOs, right? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

:: Actually 50edo doesn't meet the criteria despite being (4*24 - 46), I just checked... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 :: So you can use differences between the defining EDOs for this as well...  What's more, the patent vals of 22edo confirm your finding...  Nice... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
-:: With that in mind, I'm guessing that we can expect 48edo, 50edo, 70edo, 72edo, 92edo and 96edo to also be quartismic EDOs, right?
+:: With that in mind, I'm guessing that we can expect 48edo, 50edo, 70edo, 72edo, 92edo and 96edo to also be quartismic EDOs, right? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
+:: Actually 50edo doesn't meet the criteria despite being (4*24 - 46), I just checked... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)