94edo: Difference between revisions
m Cleanup |
+Temperament measures |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:''See also: [[Table of 94edo intervals]]'' | :''See also: [[Table of 94edo intervals]]'' | ||
== | == Just approximation == | ||
=== Selected just intervals === | |||
{| class="wikitable center-all" | {| class="wikitable center-all" | ||
! colspan="2" | | ! colspan="2" | | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
! rowspan="2" |Error | ! rowspan="2" |Error | ||
! absolute (¢) | ! absolute (¢) | ||
| 0. | | 0.00 | ||
| +0.17 | | +0.17 | ||
| -3.33 | | -3.33 | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
| +3.90 | | +3.90 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! relative (%) | ! [[Relative error|relative]] (%) | ||
| 0.0 | | 0.0 | ||
| +1.4 | | +1.4 | ||
Line 50: | Line 51: | ||
| +30.6 | | +30.6 | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Temperament measures === | |||
The following table shows [[TE temperament measures]] (RMS normalized by the rank) of 94et. | |||
{| class="wikitable center-all" | |||
! colspan="2" | | |||
! 3-limit | |||
! 5-limit | |||
! 7-limit | |||
! 11-limit | |||
! 13-limit | |||
! 17-limit | |||
! 19-limit | |||
! 23-limit | |||
! 29-limit | |||
! 31-limit | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="2" |Octave stretch (¢) | |||
| -0.054 | |||
| +0.442 | |||
| +0.208 | |||
| +0.304 | |||
| +0.162 | |||
| +0.238 | |||
| +0.323 | |||
| +0.354 | |||
| +0.227 | |||
| +0.134 | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" |Error | |||
! [[TE error|absolute]] (¢) | |||
| 0.054 | |||
| 0.704 | |||
| 0.732 | |||
| 0.683 | |||
| 0.699 | |||
| 0.674 | |||
| 0.669 | |||
| 0.637 | |||
| 0.715 | |||
| 0.741 | |||
|- | |||
! [[TE simple badness|relative]] (%) | |||
| 0.43 | |||
| 5.52 | |||
| 5.74 | |||
| 5.35 | |||
| 5.48 | |||
| 5.28 | |||
| 5.24 | |||
| 4.99 | |||
| 5.60 | |||
| 5.81 | |||
|} | |||
94et has a lower relative error than any previous ETs in the 23-limit. The next ET that does better in this subgroup is 193. | |||
== Rank two temperaments == | == Rank two temperaments == |