1920edo: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
m Categories
Line 1: Line 1:
The 1920 division divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean_temperament_measures#TE simple badness|relative error]], only [[1578edo|1578]] and [[1889edo|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[Interval_size_measure|interval size measure]].
The '''1920 division''' divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean_temperament_measures#TE simple badness|relative error]], only [[1578edo|1578]] and [[1889edo|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[Interval_size_measure|interval size measure]].


1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[12edo|12]], [[15edo|15]], [[16edo|16]], [[24edo|24]], [[60edo|60]], [[80edo|80]], [[96edo|96]], [[128edo|128]], [[240edo|240]], [[320edo|320]] and [[640edo|640]].
1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are [[10edo|10]], [[12edo|12]], [[15edo|15]], [[16edo|16]], [[24edo|24]], [[60edo|60]], [[80edo|80]], [[96edo|96]], [[128edo|128]], [[240edo|240]], [[320edo|320]] and [[640edo|640]].
[[Category:Equal divisions of the octave|####]] <!-- 4-digit number -->

Revision as of 01:21, 4 July 2022

The 1920 division divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit relative error, only 1578 and 1889 are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for interval size measure.

1920 = 2^7 * 3 * 5; some of its divisors are 10, 12, 15, 16, 24, 60, 80, 96, 128, 240, 320 and 640.