Talk:Tenney–Euclidean metrics: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
:::: Hopefully [https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki/permalink/3046365965629387/ Mike's FB post] answers part of this (hopefully this link works too). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
:::: Hopefully [https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki/permalink/3046365965629387/ Mike's FB post] answers part of this (hopefully this link works too). [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


== Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse ==
== Formulas vs. intuition ==


Rule of thumb: everything in ANY of these mathematical theory pages should be calculatable using some kind of formula. Most people are here for "put interval and temperament in, get TE seminorm out", especially if they're coming here from pages like [[hobbit]] that mention it. That means **no Moore-Penrose pseudoinverses.** I don't care if it destroys your entire theory. Whatever. Y'all shouldn't be using stuff that can't be plugged into a calculator.
Put intuition first, formulas second. This is exactly the problem with the page that I wanted to fix by adding the intuition in the first place, and you've just brought it back.


'''EDIT: Never mind.'''
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 09:31, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
 
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 02:05, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Return to "Tenney–Euclidean metrics" page.