Talk:4:5:6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Re |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Scale information off-topic? Why? == | == Scale information off-topic? Why? == | ||
I recently tried to expand the article by mentioning scale information because I think it's good to know how certain microtonal chords can be used in composition. I fail to see how such information is off-topic. If there's guidelines for what sorts of information to add to these chord pages that I don't know about, then would someone mind explaining that to me? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC) | I recently tried to expand the article by mentioning scale information because I think it's good to know how certain microtonal chords can be used in composition. I fail to see how such information is off-topic. If there's guidelines for what sorts of information to add to these chord pages that I don't know about, then would someone mind explaining that to me? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
== On the consonance or concordance of 3:4:5 over 4:5:6 == | == On the consonance or concordance of 3:4:5 over 4:5:6 == | ||
What reasons are there to conclude that 3:4:5 isn't more consonant than 4:5:6, even if it has less harmonic entropy? And what distinction is there between consonance and concordance? --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 13:47, 11 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
: 4:5:6 is rooted up to octave equivalence; 3:4:5 isn't. 4:5:6 is perfectly stable; 3:4:5 has a perfect fourth on the bass, which contrasts the missing major third and suggests moving towards it. I've mentioned these things in the article. | |||
: Sonance is more contextual than cordance, for a minimalistic answer. You can read more about it in ''Consonance and dissonance'' (and the corresponding Wikipedia article). | |||
: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) | |||