Talk:352/351: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs) |
Re |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::::: I hope the new sagittal notation section adequately addresses the original question. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | ::::: I hope the new sagittal notation section adequately addresses the original question. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Right, but now I wonder if something has recently changed. Since when did the downward version become the "main" Sagittal accidental? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:46, 9 October 2024
13/11-kleisma
How can this name be derived that it's called fairly intuitive? Please help me understand! --Xenwolf (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Fact 1: 352/351 = (32/27)/(13/11). This says it is how much 13/11 deviates from a Pythagorean interval, hence "13/11-kleisma".
- Fact 2: 352/351 = (1053/1024)/(33/32). This says it is the difference between the tridecimal quartertone and undecimal quartertone, hence "13/11-kleisma".
- The reason why it's of significance is that there's a dedicated symbol for 352/351~5120/5103 in sagittal notation, and this is how they call it. FloraC (talk) 08:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Is 352/351~5120/5103 the official notation for tempering out the interval between the both explicitly given intervals? I also read = instead some days ago. Both seem quite intuitive, the equals sign is catchier but also more challenging from the mathematical POV. --Xenwolf (talk) 10:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- I hope the new sagittal notation section adequately addresses the original question. Dave Keenan (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)