8539edo: Difference between revisions
Tristanbay (talk | contribs) fixed link to match new title capitalization style Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m Move link to External links section, misc. edits |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{EDO intro|8539}} | {{EDO intro|8539}} | ||
While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, 8539edo has seen actual use as a bookkeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a [[interval size measure|unit of interval measure]], the '''tina''' | While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, 8539edo has seen actual use as a bookkeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a [[interval size measure|unit of interval measure]], the '''tina'''. This is because it is a very strong higher-limit system, distinctly [[consistent]] through the 27-odd-limit. It is a [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #Zeta EDO lists|strict zeta]] tuning, and is also the first [[Trivial temperament|non-trivial]] EDO to be consistent in the 27-[[Odd prime sum limit|odd-prime-sum-limit]]. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are {{EDOs|72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079}}; in the 17-limit, that becomes {{EDOs|72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033}}. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until {{EDOs|20203}}. Some 17-limit commas it tempers out are [[28561/28560]], [[31213/31212]] and [[37180/37179]]; in the 19-limit it tempers out [[27456/27455]] and [[43681/43680]]. | ||
=== Prime harmonics === | === Prime harmonics === | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== Subsets and supersets === | === Subsets and supersets === | ||
8539edo is the 1065th [[prime edo]]. On that basis the tina as a unit of measure could be criticized; however, some people prefer primes for this sort of job, as they do not imply a preference for one smaller edo over another. | 8539edo is the 1065th [[prime edo]]. On that basis, the tina as a unit of measure could be criticized; however, some people prefer primes for this sort of job, as they do not imply a preference for one smaller edo over another. | ||
== External links == | |||
* [http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tina.aspx tina] on [[Tonalsoft Encyclopedia]] | |||
[[Category:Tina]] | [[Category:Tina]] | ||
Revision as of 05:37, 6 July 2024
| ← 8538edo | 8539edo | 8540edo → |
While it may strike many people as too large to be practical, 8539edo has seen actual use as a bookkeeping device to keep track of higher-limit intervals which have been allowed to freely modulate, and has been proposed as a unit of interval measure, the tina. This is because it is a very strong higher-limit system, distinctly consistent through the 27-odd-limit. It is a strict zeta tuning, and is also the first non-trivial EDO to be consistent in the 27-odd-prime-sum-limit. In the 13-limit, the only smaller systems with a lower logflat badness are 72, 270, 494, 5585 and 6079; in the 17-limit, that becomes 72, 494, 1506, 3395 and 7033. In the 19-limit, where it really shines, nothing beats it in terms of logflat badness until 20203. Some 17-limit commas it tempers out are 28561/28560, 31213/31212 and 37180/37179; in the 19-limit it tempers out 27456/27455 and 43681/43680.
Prime harmonics
| Harmonic | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 31 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error | Absolute (¢) | +0.0000 | +0.0007 | +0.0079 | -0.0005 | -0.0122 | -0.0077 | +0.0218 | -0.0075 | +0.0428 | -0.0421 | +0.0165 |
| Relative (%) | +0.0 | +0.5 | +5.6 | -0.4 | -8.7 | -5.5 | +15.5 | -5.3 | +30.4 | -30.0 | +11.8 | |
| Steps (reduced) |
8539 (0) |
13534 (4995) |
19827 (2749) |
23972 (6894) |
29540 (3923) |
31598 (5981) |
34903 (747) |
36273 (2117) |
38627 (4471) |
41482 (7326) |
42304 (8148) | |
Subsets and supersets
8539edo is the 1065th prime edo. On that basis, the tina as a unit of measure could be criticized; however, some people prefer primes for this sort of job, as they do not imply a preference for one smaller edo over another.