Direct approximation: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
add names to intervals, links to EDO pages, and some explanation about the "patent fifth"
Dummy index (talk | contribs)
add interwiki
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''patent interval''' in a given [[EDO]] is the number of EDO steps needed to reach the best approximation of a given interval – usually, but not necessarily just – in that EDO.  The method for calculating patent intervals is referred to as '''direct mapping''', and it involves [[rounding]] the product of the [[Wikipedia: binary logarithm|binary logarithm]] (''log2'') of the interval ratio (''r'') and the EDO number (''nEdo'').
{{interwiki
| en = Direct approximation
| ja = 直接近似
}}
A '''direct approximation''' of an interval in a given [[edo]] is the number of edosteps that most closely approximates it, found by [[rounding]] to the nearest integer the edo number times the [[log2|binary logarithm]] of the interval:


round(log2(r)*nEdo)
<math>\operatorname {round} (n\log_2(i))</math>


A [[patent val]] is the best mapping of a representative set of intervals (taken to be [[generator]]s for a [[JI subgroup]]) in a given EDO; for the ''p''-[[prime limit]] this set consists of [[prime interval]]s.
for ratio ''i'' in ''n''-edo.  


==== Examples of Patent Intervals ====
== Examples ==
Of these intervals, the fifth plays an important role for characterizing [[EDO]] systems (as it defines the size of M2, m2, A1). Also, a simple test can show if [[circle-of-fifths notation]] can be applied to a given EDO system, because for this the sizes of fifth and octave must be relatively prime.


{| class="wikitable center-all"
{| class="wikitable center-all"
Line 12: Line 15:
! [[12edo]] || [[17edo]] || [[19edo]] || [[26edo]]
! [[12edo]] || [[17edo]] || [[19edo]] || [[26edo]]
|-
|-
! Just perfect fifth, [[3/2]]
! Perfect fifth, [[3/2]]
|  7  ||  10  ||  11  || 15
|  7  ||  10  ||  11  || 15
|-
|-
! Just classic major third, [[5/4]]
! Just major third, [[5/4]]
|  4  ||  5  ||  6  || 8
|  4  ||  5  ||  6  || 8
|-
|-
! Just classic minor third, [[6/5]]
! Just minor third, [[6/5]]
|  3  ||  4  ||  5  || 7
|  3  ||  4  ||  5  || 7
|-
|-
Line 25: Line 28:
|}
|}


Of these intervals, the fifth plays an important role for characterizing [[edo]] systems (as it defines the size of M2, m2, A1). Also, a simple test can show if [[circle-of-fifths notation]] can be applied to a given edo system, because for this the sizes of fifth and octave must be relatively prime.
== Problems ==
Unless one sticks to one or two notes at a time, direct approximation is not always practical in harmony. For example, it is impossible to construct a [[4:5:6|just major triad]] using the direct approximations of 3/2, 5/4, and 6/5 in 17edo since the step numbers do not add up (5 steps + 4 steps ≠ 10 steps). The closest 3/2 and 5/4 imply the second closest 6/5; the closest 3/2 and 6/5 imply the second closest 5/4; and the closest 5/4 and 6/5 imply the second closest 3/2. We see one of the direct approximations must be given up. This is called [[consistency|inconsistency]], and chords like this exists in every edo.
In [[regular temperament theory]], intervals are mapped through [[val]]s. Although more complex, it recognizes the fact that intervals like 3/2, 5/4, and 6/5 are related, as the number of steps of one interval is determined once the other two have been determined. The three situations in the above example correspond to using vals {{val| 17 27 39 }}, {{val| 17 27 40 }}, and {{val| 17 26 39 }}, respectively.
[[Category:Interval]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Method]]
[[Category:Method]]
[[Category:Val]]
[[Category:Todo]]

Latest revision as of 12:16, 23 August 2025

A direct approximation of an interval in a given edo is the number of edosteps that most closely approximates it, found by rounding to the nearest integer the edo number times the binary logarithm of the interval:

[math]\displaystyle{ \operatorname {round} (n\log_2(i)) }[/math]

for ratio i in n-edo.

Examples

Interval, ratio 12edo 17edo 19edo 26edo
Perfect fifth, 3/2 7 10 11 15
Just major third, 5/4 4 5 6 8
Just minor third, 6/5 3 4 5 7
Harmonic seventh, 7/4 10 14 15 21

Of these intervals, the fifth plays an important role for characterizing edo systems (as it defines the size of M2, m2, A1). Also, a simple test can show if circle-of-fifths notation can be applied to a given edo system, because for this the sizes of fifth and octave must be relatively prime.

Problems

Unless one sticks to one or two notes at a time, direct approximation is not always practical in harmony. For example, it is impossible to construct a just major triad using the direct approximations of 3/2, 5/4, and 6/5 in 17edo since the step numbers do not add up (5 steps + 4 steps ≠ 10 steps). The closest 3/2 and 5/4 imply the second closest 6/5; the closest 3/2 and 6/5 imply the second closest 5/4; and the closest 5/4 and 6/5 imply the second closest 3/2. We see one of the direct approximations must be given up. This is called inconsistency, and chords like this exists in every edo.

In regular temperament theory, intervals are mapped through vals. Although more complex, it recognizes the fact that intervals like 3/2, 5/4, and 6/5 are related, as the number of steps of one interval is determined once the other two have been determined. The three situations in the above example correspond to using vals 17 27 39], 17 27 40], and 17 26 39], respectively.