Talk:Octave reduction: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:10, 18 July 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Introduction: re ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:09, 18 July 2021 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,129 edits No edit summary
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::: This is great news! I also don't have anything against reorganizing stuff. As long as we provide an easy way to approach concepts. In this special case, octave reduction will be quite understandable, because of the very broad acceptance of the ''octave equivalence'' concept (in western music). Good luck for further reorganization! --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 13:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)		::: This is great news! I also don't have anything against reorganizing stuff. As long as we provide an easy way to approach concepts. In this special case, octave reduction will be quite understandable, because of the very broad acceptance of the ''octave equivalence'' concept (in western music). Good luck for further reorganization! --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 13:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

			:::: I reorganized the page as discussed and added the other elements that I had in mind. If there is anything else to mention, please let me know. [[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 17:09, 18 July 2021 (UTC)