17/9: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>Andrew_Heathwaite **Imported revision 283166100 - Original comment: ** |
+more discussion |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox Interval | |||
| Name = large septendecimal major seventh | |||
| Color name = 17o8, iso octave | |||
| Sound = jid_17_9_pluck_adu_dr220.mp3 | |||
}} | |||
In [[17-limit]] [[just intonation]], '''17/9''' is the '''septendecimal diminished octave''' or the '''septendecimal major seventh''', depending on how one views it. It measures about 1101¢. It is the [[mediant]] between [[15/8]] and [[2/1]]. Its inversion is [[18/17]], the "small septendecimal semitone". | |||
== Terminology and notation == | |||
There exists a disagreement in different conceptualization systems on whether 17/9 should be a major seventh or a diminished octave. The diminished octave view corresponds to [[Functional Just System]], with the formal comma [[4131/4096]] separating it from [[4096/2187]], the Pythagorean diminished octave. The major seventh view corresponds to [[Helmholtz-Ellis notation]], with the formal comma [[2187/2176]] separating it from [[243/128]], the Pythagorean major seventh. | |||
See | |||
In practice, the interval category may, arguably, vary by context. One solution for the JI user who uses expanded [[circle-of-fifths notation]] is to prepare a [[Pythagorean comma]] accidental so that the interval can be notated in either category. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[18/17]] – its [[octave complement]] | |||
* [[Gallery of Just Intervals]] | |||
[[Category:Seventh]] | |||
[[Category:Major seventh]] | |||
[[Category:Octave]] | |||
[[Category:Diminished octave]] |
Latest revision as of 09:38, 12 January 2023
Interval information |
[sound info]
In 17-limit just intonation, 17/9 is the septendecimal diminished octave or the septendecimal major seventh, depending on how one views it. It measures about 1101¢. It is the mediant between 15/8 and 2/1. Its inversion is 18/17, the "small septendecimal semitone".
Terminology and notation
There exists a disagreement in different conceptualization systems on whether 17/9 should be a major seventh or a diminished octave. The diminished octave view corresponds to Functional Just System, with the formal comma 4131/4096 separating it from 4096/2187, the Pythagorean diminished octave. The major seventh view corresponds to Helmholtz-Ellis notation, with the formal comma 2187/2176 separating it from 243/128, the Pythagorean major seventh.
In practice, the interval category may, arguably, vary by context. One solution for the JI user who uses expanded circle-of-fifths notation is to prepare a Pythagorean comma accidental so that the interval can be notated in either category.