Talk:Schismatic family: Difference between revisions

(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~

~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

~~----~~

== ~~Link~~ to ~~german?~~ ==

== Move to "Schismic family" ==

~~Is there a reason whiy the link to the german article was removed?~~

- ~~'''hstraub''' August 31, 2016, 01:19:34 AM UTC~~-~~0700~~

-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

----

~~...no idea~~, ~~but seemingly by mistake~~

~~- '''xenwolf~~''' ~~September 03~~, ~~2016, 04~~:29:~~52 AM~~ UTC~~-0700~~

: It's schismic that's non-standard. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

----

:: Schismic is systematic though, and much more common. We don't say "ragismatic" or "kleismatic". And for the family of temperaments (which is only a modern xen concept derived from the historical concept of schismatic temperament), it makes sense to use the systematic name. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 21:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

::: It's a Greek third declension noun. This pattern is pretty common: dogma - dogmatic, drama - dramatic, trauma - traumatic. I don't care what happens with neologisms like ragismic. "Much more common" no it's not. A quick look at some literature makes this pretty clear. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

::: Oh, and how could I forget: chroma - chromatic! – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]])

:::: AFAIK neither is more correct than the other. E.g. ''Systematic'' & ''systemic'' both exist. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
+{{WSArchiveLink}}
-'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
-----
-== Link to german? ==
+== Move to "Schismic family" ==
-Is there a reason whiy the link to the german article was removed?
-- '''hstraub''' August 31, 2016, 01:19:34 AM UTC-0700
+-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
-----
-...no idea, but seemingly by mistake
-- '''xenwolf''' September 03, 2016, 04:29:52 AM UTC-0700
+: It's schismic that's non-standard. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
-----
+:: Schismic is systematic though, and much more common. We don't say "ragismatic" or "kleismatic". And for the family of temperaments (which is only a modern xen concept derived from the historical concept of schismatic temperament), it makes sense to use the systematic name. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 21:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
+::: It's a Greek third declension noun. This pattern is pretty common: dogma - dogmatic, drama - dramatic, trauma - traumatic. I don't care what happens with neologisms like ragismic. "Much more common" no it's not. A quick look at some literature makes this pretty clear. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
+::: Oh, and how could I forget: chroma - chromatic! – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]])
+:::: AFAIK neither is more correct than the other. E.g. ''Systematic'' & ''systemic'' both exist. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)