Talk:Subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Organizing fractional-subgroup temperaments == | == Organizing fractional-subgroup temperaments == | ||
I don't see why it's desirable to group them by the first fractional element in the subgroup basis. Does it not make more sense to group 2.3.7/5 with 2.3.11/7, for example? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:48, 20 June 2026 (UTC) | I don't see why it's desirable to group them by the first fractional element in the subgroup basis. Does it not make more sense to group 2.3.7/5 with 2.3.11/7, for example? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:48, 20 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
: The real question is twofold. Firstly, are there any other pages that use this organisation method? And secondly, are you willing to ''carefully'' reorganise the whole page in alignment to your preferred principle? I am in favour of your organisation FWIW as the page looks like a total mess to me so at the very least it'd be an improvement. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:14, 20 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: > Are there any other pages that use this organisation method? | |||
:: I think this page is a singularity. | |||
:: > Are you willing to ''carefully'' reorganise the whole page in alignment to your preferred principle? | |||
:: I am, sort of. In fact I need to see the result to decide if it looks better. Not high priority for me, however. | |||
:: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC) | |||