Talk:Ed7/3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::: I'm in support of deleting most of the ed5/3 and ed7/3 pages based on that guideline. I think this page itself should be considered under a different standard, and we'll have a clearer idea if we clean it up from MMTMisms (like "Middletown Valley" etc.). | ::: I'm in support of deleting most of the ed5/3 and ed7/3 pages based on that guideline. I think this page itself should be considered under a different standard, and we'll have a clearer idea if we clean it up from MMTMisms (like "Middletown Valley" etc.). | ||
::: Regards. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:43, 13 May 2026 (UTC) | ::: Regards. -- [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:43, 13 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
Using this thread for a wider discussion about the proliferation of various edX pages. | |||
Another complaint by users is the pollution of search results for common edos. | |||
For example, the search string "31ed" brings up: | |||
: 31ed4 | |||
: 31ed5/2 | |||
: 31ed5/4 | |||
: 31ed6 | |||
: 31ed7/3 | |||
: 31ed7/4 | |||
: 31ed8 | |||
: 31edf | |||
: 31edo | |||
When presumably most users are looking for 31edo. Now, some of these might actually be useful, but surely not all of them. | |||
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 13:39, 14 May 2026 (UTC) | |||