Lumatone mapping for 91edo: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The large number of notes results in both the flat ([[patent val]]) and sharp (b val) fifths failing to cover the gamut, with both skipping many notes. If not for this problem, the flat version would be a respectable [[Schismic–Pythagorean_equivalence_continuum#Python|Python]] or [[Meantone]] (91c) mapping, while the sharp version would be a respectable mapping for [[Quasiultra]] (as 91bd). | The large number of notes results in both the flat ([[patent val]]) and sharp (b val) fifths failing to cover the gamut, with both skipping many notes. If not for this problem, the flat version would be a respectable [[Schismic–Pythagorean_equivalence_continuum#Python|Python]] or [[Meantone]] (91c) mapping, while the sharp version would be a respectable mapping for [[Quasiultra]] (as 91bd). | ||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=89|xstep=15|ystep=-7}} | {{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=89|xstep=15|ystep=-7}} | ||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=22|xstep=17|ystep=-14}} | {{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=22|xstep=17|ystep=-14}} | ||