Talk:S-monzo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
resolution |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Do smonzos allow redundant generators? If not then this notion of S-monzo may turn out to be a subset of the term and therefore the terms can unambiguously refer to the same thing. | : Do smonzos allow redundant generators? If not then this notion of S-monzo may turn out to be a subset of the term and therefore the terms can unambiguously refer to the same thing. | ||
: If not, please feel free to make it a disambiguation page, or make it refer to "smonzos" by default and offer "if you meant S-monzos in the context of S-expressions, see ...". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC) | : If not, please feel free to make it a disambiguation page, or make it refer to "smonzos" by default and offer "if you meant S-monzos in the context of S-expressions, see ...". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Should be resolved. Renamed the concept to "S-factorization". | :: Should be resolved. Renamed the concept to "S-factorization". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 00:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:00, 2 August 2023
Possible confusion with subgroup monzo?
I wonder if this should be made a disambiguation page. FloraC (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- We could also opt for Template:Distinguish, since the names are not exactly identical. Fredg999 (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Do smonzos allow redundant generators? If not then this notion of S-monzo may turn out to be a subset of the term and therefore the terms can unambiguously refer to the same thing.
- If not, please feel free to make it a disambiguation page, or make it refer to "smonzos" by default and offer "if you meant S-monzos in the context of S-expressions, see ...". --Godtone (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)