Talk:Subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions
→"Breedsmic": re |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:: Thank you for supporting my ideas. I don't understand the suffix either. Besides "-tri" I also see "-tet". The only common thing among the "-tet" temps seems to be that they're all kinda supported by 4et. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC) | :: Thank you for supporting my ideas. I don't understand the suffix either. Besides "-tri" I also see "-tet". The only common thing among the "-tet" temps seems to be that they're all kinda supported by 4et. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Clarification needed == | |||
Why is there "clarification needed" on CTE generators of some 3/2-repeating temperaments? I had calculated the generators using sintel's temperament calculator so they should be correct. | |||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 23:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
: There's the distinction of subgroup CTE vs inharmonic CTE for fractional subgroup temperaments. If you happen to know which scheme is used in sintel's calculator feel free to clarify. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 06:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
:: By comparing Sintel's calculator and x31eq, I have confirmed Sintel's calculator uses subgroup ''TE''. It is very likely Sintel's calculator is consistent in using subgroup tuning for both TE and CTE, but I cannot confirm this because x31eq does not show CTE. | |||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 07:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
::: Alright. That's a good reason to believe it's subgroup CTE. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::: Just want to confirm that the calculator indeed does subgroup TE for both cases. - [[User:Sintel|Sintel]] ([[User talk:Sintel|talk]]) |