Talk:Table of 198edo intervals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
It seems that the meaning of <code>"</code> is meant to be ''the same content as left of this cell'' in this case, in most other cases it's ''the same content as above this cell''. I have my reservations about this shorthand, although of course I understand that it saves a lot of useless reading and thus increases the overview considerably. In javascript-enhanced tables it breaks or prevents sortability. Could it be possible to get the same effect via CSS? Would it even be a stylistic matter? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | It seems that the meaning of <code>"</code> is meant to be ''the same content as left of this cell'' in this case, in most other cases it's ''the same content as above this cell''. I have my reservations about this shorthand, although of course I understand that it saves a lot of useless reading and thus increases the overview considerably. In javascript-enhanced tables it breaks or prevents sortability. Could it be possible to get the same effect via CSS? Would it even be a stylistic matter? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Just thought I'd throw this out there, but the phrase ''the same content as left of this cell'' is also the meaning of the merged cells on the 94edo page... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 13:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | : Just thought I'd throw this out there, but the phrase ''the same content as left of this cell'' is also the meaning of the merged cells on the 94edo Intervals page... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 13:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:56, 30 November 2020
Repeating decimal notation
What about Template:Overline? I found it in use on Wikipedia: Repeating decimal --Xenwolf (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Here an example:
| 5 | 30.30 | 55/54, 56/55 | ? | ||
| 6 | 36.36 | ? | 49/48, 50/49 | ? | ? |
| 7 | 42.42 | ? | 40/39 | ||
| 8 | 48.48 | ? | 36/35 | ? | ? |
| 9 | 54.54 | 33/32 | 65/63 | ||
| 10 | 60.60 | ? | 28/27 | ? | ? |
--Xenwolf (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
The " meaning
It seems that the meaning of " is meant to be the same content as left of this cell in this case, in most other cases it's the same content as above this cell. I have my reservations about this shorthand, although of course I understand that it saves a lot of useless reading and thus increases the overview considerably. In javascript-enhanced tables it breaks or prevents sortability. Could it be possible to get the same effect via CSS? Would it even be a stylistic matter? --Xenwolf (talk) 12:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)