Talk:Subgroup temperaments: Difference between revisions
→Baldy -> baldi: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Page is too cluttered == | == Page is too cluttered == | ||
We'd better soon split this page into several, probably by subgroups. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC) | We'd better soon split this page into several, probably by subgroups. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
== "Breedsmic" == | == "Breedsmic" == | ||
I don't suppose meaningful distinction can be made between "breed" and "breedsmic". Iow both should be referring to the same 7-limit rank-3 temperament, not this fractional subgroup thing. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC) | I don't suppose meaningful distinction can be made between "breed" and "breedsmic". Iow both should be referring to the same 7-limit rank-3 temperament, not this fractional subgroup thing. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
| Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
== Baldy -> baldi == | == Baldy -> baldi == | ||
This name change would make the temperament's connection to garibaldi more obvious. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 01:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
: I personally think it's obvious enough already. "Baldy" is used on many other pages, so the community should decide whether to change before updating it across the wiki. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 03:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
== Organizing fractional-subgroup temperaments == | |||
I don't see why it's desirable to group them by the first fractional element in the subgroup basis. Does it not make more sense to group 2.3.7/5 with 2.3.11/7, for example? —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:48, 20 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
: The real question is twofold. Firstly, are there any other pages that use this organisation method? And secondly, are you willing to ''carefully'' reorganise the whole page in alignment to your preferred principle? I am in favour of your organisation FWIW as the page looks like a total mess to me so at the very least it'd be an improvement. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 16:14, 20 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: > Are there any other pages that use this organisation method? | |||
:: I think this page is a singularity. | |||
:: > Are you willing to ''carefully'' reorganise the whole page in alignment to your preferred principle? | |||
:: I am, sort of. In fact I need to see the result to decide if it looks better. Not high priority for me, however. | |||
:: —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:53, 21 June 2026 (UTC) | |||