Equal-step tuning: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Wikispaces>danstearns
**Imported revision 4848156 - Original comment: **
Split
 
(361 intermediate revisions by 37 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
{{interwiki
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
| de = Gleichstufige_Tonsysteme
: This revision was by author [[User:danstearns|danstearns]] and made on <tt>2007-06-08 10:53:25 UTC</tt>.<br>
| en = Equal-step tuning
: The original revision id was <tt>4848156</tt>.<br>
| ja = 平均律
: The revision comment was: <tt></tt><br>
}}
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
{{Wikipedia|Equal temperament}}
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">An Equal Temperament, in the most general sense, is a tuning in which every single step is the same interval; an equal-step scale. This single-step interval is often described as a fraction of another interval—the divisions paradigm, if you will—but it can also be explicitly given.


There is a convention which takes "X tone equal temperament" to mean "X divisions of 2/1, the octave"; this is abbreviated tET or some variant. Because "equal //temperament//" literally refers to treating these scales as [[temperament|temperaments]] of JI, the less loaded term //EDO//, meaning "equal divisions of the octave", introduced by Dan Stearns and later popularized by Joe Monzo, is helpful especially for denoting scales that do not even //try// to resemble JI.
An '''equal-step tuning''', '''equal tuning''', or '''equal division''' ('''ED''') is a [[period]]ic [[tuning system]] where the distance between adjacent steps is of constant [[Interval size|size]]. The size of this single step is given explicitly (e.g. [[88cET|88-cent equal tuning]]) or as a fraction of a larger interval (e.g. [[13edo|13 equal divisions of the octave]]). Any interval, rational/just, or irrational, may be used as the basis for an equal tuning, although divisions of the octave are most common, leading to [[edo]] systems. When a just interval is equally divided, it is assumed none of the resulting intervals are just, because if the interval has a rational root it is seen as a division of that [[root]].


There are other less standard terms, many in the [[http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/encyclopedia.aspx|Tonalsoft Encyclopedia]].
When a tuning is called '''''n''-tone equal temperament''' (abbreviated ''n''-tet or ''n''-et), this usually means "''n'' divisions of 2/1, the octave, or some approximation thereof", but it also implies a mindset of [[temperament]] – that is, of a [[just intonation|JI-approximation-based]] understanding of the scale. If you are wondering how equal divisions of the octave can become associated with temperaments, the page [[EDOs to ETs]] may help clarify.


----
There are many reasons why one might choose to not consider JI approximations when dealing with equal tunings, and thus not treat equal tunings as temperaments. In such case, the less theory-laden term '''edo''' (occasionally written '''ed2'''), meaning '''equal divisions of the octave''' (or '''equal divisions of 2/1'''), leaves comparison to JI out of the picture, aside from the octave itself (which is assumed to be just). There are other less standard terms, many in the [http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/encyclopedia.aspx Tonalsoft Encyclopedia]. More generally, the term '''ed-''p''''' can be used, where ''p'' is any frequency ratio. For example, the equal-tempering of the [[Bohlen–Pierce scale]] may be referred to as 13ed3, for 13 equal divisions of 3/1 (the 3rd harmonic).
== ==
=The Divisions Paradigm=
From a [[JustIntonation|Just Intonation]] perspective, it is important to note that if the large interval being divided is just, none of its divisions will be just—you can only have one! and its multiples...


===Equal Divisions of the Octave (2/1)===
''As the steps are tuned to be equal, equal scales may be taken to close anywhere composers wish them to.'' Barring the convention of closing equal divisions of particular just intervals at those stated just intervals, there are infinite synonymous names for each equal scale.
[[5edo|5]] [[7edo|7]] [[8edo|8]] [[9edo|9]] [[10edo|10]] [[11edo|11]] [[13edo|13]] [[14edo|14]] [[15edo|15]] [[16edo|16]] [[17edo|17]]
[[19edo|19]] [[22edo|22]] [[31edo|31]]


===Equal Divisions of the Tritave (3/1)===
''As there are infinitely many intervals, there are infinitely many equal scales.'' Barring technicalities, there are large quantities of perceivably different equal scales. Seeing such a diverse menagerie at their disposal, some composers choose to combine multiple equal tunings [[ET survey|sequentially]] or [[Polymicrotonality|simultaneously]].
12
[[BohlenPierce|13 (Bohlen-Pierce)]]


===Equal Divisions of the Perfect Fifth (3/2)===
An equal-step tuning is an [[Arithmetic tuning|arithmetic]] and [[harmonotonic tuning]]. In terms of what musical resource is divided, it divides pitch, so another term for equal-step tuning is '''equal pitch division (EPD)'''. Since pitch is the most commonly divided resource, this can be shortened to just '''equal division (ED)'''.
[[88cET|8 (88-cET)]]


===Equal Divisions of the Just Major 17th (5/1)===
== Formula ==
25 (Stockhausen, McLaren)
To find the step size of ''n''-ed-''p'' in terms of [[cent]]s, divide the cents of ''p'' by ''n''. The size ''s'' of ''k'' steps of ''n''-ed-''p'' (''k''\''n'' <''p''>) is


=The explicit paradigm=
<math>\displaystyle s = 1200 \log_2 (p) \cdot k/n</math>
88-cET, Alpha, Beta, Gamma


=The stretch paradigm=
To find the step size of ''n''-edo in terms of [[frequency ratio]], take the ''n''-th root of ''p''. For example, the step of 12edo is 2<sup>1/12</sup> (≈ 1.059). So the ratio ''c'' of ''k'' steps of ''n''-ed-''p'' is


...coming soon...
<math>\displaystyle c = p^{k/n}</math>


----
In particular, when ''k'' is 0, ''c'' is simply 1, because any number to the 0th power is 1. And when ''k'' = ''n'', ''c'' is simply ''p'', because any number to the 1st power is itself.


=Equal temperament surveys=  
== Lookalike equal divisions ==
A rather strange emerging genre. Some curious composers, wishing to test the Darregian notion that each equal temperament, to a certain extent, possesses a certain quality or mood to it, endeavor to compose entire series of pieces which sample the field, often sequentially. Easley Blackwood's rather neoclassical //Microtonal Etudes// (1980-1), in EDO's 13 through 24, was one of the first such surveys. [[McLaren|Brian McLaren]]'s idiosyncratic //240 Piano Pieces// from the 90's, with 5 pieces in each tuning from 5/oct to 53/oct (excepting 12!), might be the most extensive, so much that each set of 5 pieces might be thought of as a whole. [[Warren Burt]]'s //39 Dissonant Etudes// (1992-8) (5/oct to 43/oct) all use the same basic technique to generate "dissonance."
What do 12ed2, 19ed3, and 28ed5 all have in common? They are all approximately the same scale. This happens because 12ed2 is an accurate temperament (for its size) that contains relatively close approximations of 3/1 and 5/1. In contrast, 11ed2 does not correspond closely to any equal division of 3/1 or 5/1.


Daniel Wolf has a series of etudes from ET's 8 through 23, excepting 10, 12, and 20, written between 1994 and 2004. Jacob Barton's //Moods// and //Xenharmonic Variations on a Theme by Mozart// from 2004 progress sequentially in sections (ET's 1-13 and 12-19). Igliashon Jones is currently at work on an album of electronic pop songs in 13-24 (right?) EDOs in which the time signature matches the tuning(!), an idea from Hans Straub, who has written such works in 5- and 17-EDO.
The following plot shows equal divisions of 2/1, 3/1, 5/1, and 7/1, and points out some instances when three or more of them happen to be close together. Note that any equal division of 2/1 is automatically an equal division of 4/1; and if something is simultaneously a good equal division of both 2/1 and 3/1, then it is a good equal division of 6/1 as well.


In addition to the proper surveys, many individuals have pieces in a wide range of EDOs that don't necessarily constitute suites or "thorough" surveys. Ivor Darreg, Marc Jones, Dan Stearns, Gene Ward Smith, X. J. Scott, Andrew Heathwaite, and Aaron Hunt come to mind, as well as more music by Brian McLaren and Warren Burt.
[[File:equal.png|alt=equal.png|800x69px|equal.png]]


=[[Polymicrotonality]] with equal temperaments=
(Unlimited resolution version: [[:File:equal.svg|equal.svg]])
You are invited to share your experiences with combining equal temperaments with each other and with unequal temperaments.</pre></div>
 
<h4>Original HTML content:</h4>
For the mathematically inclined, this kind of diagram is closely related to [[The Riemann zeta function and tuning|the Riemann zeta function]].
<div style="width:100%; max-height:400pt; overflow:auto; background-color:#f8f9fa; border: 1px solid #eaecf0; padding:0em"><pre style="margin:0px;border:none;background:none;word-wrap:break-word;width:200%;white-space: pre-wrap ! important" class="old-revision-html">&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;title&gt;Equal-step Tuning&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;An Equal Temperament, in the most general sense, is a tuning in which every single step is the same interval; an equal-step scale. This single-step interval is often described as a fraction of another interval—the divisions paradigm, if you will—but it can also be explicitly given.&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalog of equal-step tunings ==
There is a convention which takes &amp;quot;X tone equal temperament&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;X divisions of 2/1, the octave&amp;quot;; this is abbreviated tET or some variant. Because &amp;quot;equal &lt;em&gt;temperament&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot; literally refers to treating these scales as &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/temperament"&gt;temperaments&lt;/a&gt; of JI, the less loaded term &lt;em&gt;EDO&lt;/em&gt;, meaning &amp;quot;equal divisions of the octave&amp;quot;, introduced by Dan Stearns and later popularized by Joe Monzo, is helpful especially for denoting scales that do not even &lt;em&gt;try&lt;/em&gt; to resemble JI.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equal divisions ===
&lt;br /&gt;
: <small>''Includes Ed''p'' for ''p'' with a [[Wilson height]] ≤ 10 and integer limit ≤ 8 (plus some extras due to strong consensus for their inclusion).''</small>
There are other less standard terms, many in the &lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/encyclopedia.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tonalsoft Encyclopedia&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed9/8]] (… of the major whole tone)
&lt;hr /&gt;
* [[Ed6/5]] (… of the classic minor third)
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&amp;lt;h2&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h2 id="toc0"&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 --&gt; &lt;/h2&gt;
* [[Ed5/4]] (… of the classic major third)
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:2:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc1"&gt;&lt;a name="The Divisions Paradigm"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:2 --&gt;The Divisions Paradigm&lt;/h1&gt;
* [[Ed4/3]] (… of the perfect fourth)
From a &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/JustIntonation"&gt;Just Intonation&lt;/a&gt; perspective, it is important to note that if the large interval being divided is just, none of its divisions will be just—you can only have one! and its multiples...&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:4:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc2"&gt;&lt;a name="The Divisions Paradigm--Equal Divisions of the Octave (2/1)"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:4 --&gt;Equal Divisions of the Octave (2/1)&lt;/h3&gt;
* '''[[EDF]] (… of the perfect fifth, [[3/2]])'''
&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/5edo"&gt;5&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/7edo"&gt;7&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/8edo"&gt;8&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/9edo"&gt;9&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/10edo"&gt;10&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/11edo"&gt;11&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/13edo"&gt;13&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/14edo"&gt;14&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/15edo"&gt;15&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/16edo"&gt;16&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/17edo"&gt;17&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** most famously approximates [[Carlos Alpha]], [[Carlos Beta|Beta]] and [[Carlos Gamma|Gamma]], but lots of others, too
&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/19edo"&gt;19&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/22edo"&gt;22&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/31edo"&gt;31&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:6:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc3"&gt;&lt;a name="The Divisions Paradigm--Equal Divisions of the Tritave (3/1)"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:6 --&gt;Equal Divisions of the Tritave (3/1)&lt;/h3&gt;
* [[Edφ|Ed''φ'']] (… of [[acoustic phi]])
12&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed5/3]] (… of the classic major sixth)
&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/BohlenPierce"&gt;13 (Bohlen-Pierce)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:8:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc4"&gt;&lt;a name="The Divisions Paradigm--Equal Divisions of the Perfect Fifth (3/2)"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:8 --&gt;Equal Divisions of the Perfect Fifth (3/2)&lt;/h3&gt;
* '''[[EDO]] (… of the [[octave]], 2/1)'''
&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/88cET"&gt;8 (88-cET)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:10:&amp;lt;h3&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h3 id="toc5"&gt;&lt;a name="The Divisions Paradigm--Equal Divisions of the Just Major 17th (5/1)"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:10 --&gt;Equal Divisions of the Just Major 17th (5/1)&lt;/h3&gt;
* [[Ed9/4]] (… of the 3-limit major ninth)
25 (Stockhausen, McLaren)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed7/3]] (… of the septimal minor tenth)
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed5/2]] (… of the classic major tenth)
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:12:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc6"&gt;&lt;a name="The explicit paradigm"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:12 --&gt;The explicit paradigm&lt;/h1&gt;
* [[Ed8/3]] (… of the perfect eleventh)
88-cET, Alpha, Beta, Gamma&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ede|Ed''e'']] (… of [[acoustic e|acoustic ''e'']])
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:14:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc7"&gt;&lt;a name="The stretch paradigm"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:14 --&gt;The stretch paradigm&lt;/h1&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[EDT]] (… of the [[tritave]]/twelfth, 3/1)'''
...coming soon...&lt;br /&gt;
** most famously approximates the [[Bohlen–Pierce scale]], but lots of others, too
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;hr /&gt;
 
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed7/2]] (… of the septimal minor fourteenth)
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:16:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc8"&gt;&lt;a name="Equal temperament surveys"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:16 --&gt;Equal temperament surveys&lt;/h1&gt;
* [[Ed4]] (… of the double octave, [[4/1]])
A rather strange emerging genre. Some curious composers, wishing to test the Darregian notion that each equal temperament, to a certain extent, possesses a certain quality or mood to it, endeavor to compose entire series of pieces which sample the field, often sequentially. Easley Blackwood's rather neoclassical &lt;em&gt;Microtonal Etudes&lt;/em&gt; (1980-1), in EDO's 13 through 24, was one of the first such surveys. &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/McLaren"&gt;Brian McLaren&lt;/a&gt;'s idiosyncratic &lt;em&gt;240 Piano Pieces&lt;/em&gt; from the 90's, with 5 pieces in each tuning from 5/oct to 53/oct (excepting 12!), might be the most extensive, so much that each set of 5 pieces might be thought of as a whole. &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Warren%20Burt"&gt;Warren Burt&lt;/a&gt;'s &lt;em&gt;39 Dissonant Etudes&lt;/em&gt; (1992-8) (5/oct to 43/oct) all use the same basic technique to generate &amp;quot;dissonance.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed5]] (… of the 5th harmonic)
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed6]] (… of the 6th harmonic)
Daniel Wolf has a series of etudes from ET's 8 through 23, excepting 10, 12, and 20, written between 1994 and 2004. Jacob Barton's &lt;em&gt;Moods&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Xenharmonic Variations on a Theme by Mozart&lt;/em&gt; from 2004 progress sequentially in sections (ET's 1-13 and 12-19). Igliashon Jones is currently at work on an album of electronic pop songs in 13-24 (right?) EDOs in which the time signature matches the tuning(!), an idea from Hans Straub, who has written such works in 5- and 17-EDO.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed7]] (… of the 7th harmonic)
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed8]] (… of the 8th harmonic)
In addition to the proper surveys, many individuals have pieces in a wide range of EDOs that don't necessarily constitute suites or &amp;quot;thorough&amp;quot; surveys. Ivor Darreg, Marc Jones, Dan Stearns, Gene Ward Smith, X. J. Scott, Andrew Heathwaite, and Aaron Hunt come to mind, as well as more music by Brian McLaren and Warren Burt.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ed12]] (… of the 12th harmonic)
&lt;br /&gt;
 
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:18:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc9"&gt;&lt;a name="Polymicrotonality with equal temperaments"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:18 --&gt;&lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/Polymicrotonality"&gt;Polymicrotonality&lt;/a&gt; with equal temperaments&lt;/h1&gt;
 
You are invited to share your experiences with combining equal temperaments with each other and with unequal temperaments.&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre></div>
=== Equal multiplications ===
An equal multiplication of a ''rational'' interval can also be called an '''ambitonal sequence (AS)'''. For example, the 25/24 equal-step tuning could also be written AS25/24.
 
An equal multiplication of an ''irrational'' interval can also be called an '''arithmetic pitch sequence (APS)'''. For example, the 65-[[cents]] equal-step tuning could also be written APS65¢.
 
The union of both is equivalent to the unity division of a target interval. For example, AS25/24 is 1ed25/24, and APS65¢ is 1ed65¢.
 
==== List of notable AS ====
* [[1ed9/8|AS9/8]]
* [[21/20|AS21/20]]
* [[1ed33/32|AS33/32]]
 
==== List of notable APS ====
* APS13.94—13.97¢, tunings for the [[8ed16/15|Delta scale]]
* APS35.099¢, tuning of [[Carlos Gamma]]
* APS63.59—63.82¢, [[Phoenix]] tunings
* APS63.833¢, tuning of [[Carlos Beta]]
* [[1ed69c|APS69¢]]
* APS77.965¢, tuning of [[Carlos Alpha]]
* [[1ed86.4c|APS86.4¢]], a.k.a. "13.888edo"
* [[88cET|APS88¢]]
* [[1ed97.5c|APS97.5¢]]
* [[1ed125c|APS125¢]]
* [[Zeta peak index]] tunings
** [[1zpi]] = 1065.1767…cET
** [[2zpi]] = 608.2826…cET
** [[3zpi]] = 470.7997…cET
** …
 
== Edonoi ==
An '''equal division of a non-octave interval''' ('''EDONOI''' or '''edonoi''') is a [[tuning]] obtained by dividing a [[non-octave]] [[interval]] in a certain number of equal steps. In a broader sense, any equal-step tuning that is not an integer [[edo]] is an edonoi.
 
The most often used edonoi include the equal-tempering of the [[Bohlen–Pierce scale]] (i.e. [[13edt|13 equal divisions of 3]]), the [[Phoenix]] tuning, tunings of [[Carlos Alpha]], [[Carlos Beta|Beta]], and [[Carlos Gamma|Gamma]], the [[19edt|19 equal divisions of 3]], the [[6edf|6 equal divisions of 3/2]], the [[2ed13/10|2 equal divisions of 13/10]], and [[88cET]]. Other strong edonoi include [[69ed7]] and [[143ed11]], respectively very accurate in the 3.5.7.11.13 subgroup and the 5.7.8.9.11.13.17.23 subgroup. For a more extensive gallery, see the [[#Equal divisions]] section above.
 
Some edonoi contain an interval close to [[2/1]] that might function like a [[stretched and compressed tuning|stretched or squashed]] octave – those edonoi can thus be considered variations on edos.  
 
Other edonoi contain no approximation of an octave or a compound octave (at least, not for a while), and continue generating new tones as they continue upward or downward. Such scales lack a very familiar compositional redundancy, that of [[octave equivalence]] – this might necessitate special attention.
 
== See also ==
* [[Equal division of the octave]]
* [[Families of scales]]
* [[Maximal evenness]]
* Some pages about the same thing as equal-step tuning, but framed differently:
** [[User:Cmloegcmluin/EPD]] (ED for short)
** [[User:Cmloegcmluin/AS]]
** [[User:Cmloegcmluin/APS]]
 
== External links ==
* [http://www.nonoctave.com/tuning/quintave.html X. J. Scott's Equal Divisions of Rational Intervals]
 
[[Category:Equal-step tuning| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Acronyms]]
[[Category:Tuning]]

Latest revision as of 11:58, 16 November 2025

English Wikipedia has an article on:

An equal-step tuning, equal tuning, or equal division (ED) is a periodic tuning system where the distance between adjacent steps is of constant size. The size of this single step is given explicitly (e.g. 88-cent equal tuning) or as a fraction of a larger interval (e.g. 13 equal divisions of the octave). Any interval, rational/just, or irrational, may be used as the basis for an equal tuning, although divisions of the octave are most common, leading to edo systems. When a just interval is equally divided, it is assumed none of the resulting intervals are just, because if the interval has a rational root it is seen as a division of that root.

When a tuning is called n-tone equal temperament (abbreviated n-tet or n-et), this usually means "n divisions of 2/1, the octave, or some approximation thereof", but it also implies a mindset of temperament – that is, of a JI-approximation-based understanding of the scale. If you are wondering how equal divisions of the octave can become associated with temperaments, the page EDOs to ETs may help clarify.

There are many reasons why one might choose to not consider JI approximations when dealing with equal tunings, and thus not treat equal tunings as temperaments. In such case, the less theory-laden term edo (occasionally written ed2), meaning equal divisions of the octave (or equal divisions of 2/1), leaves comparison to JI out of the picture, aside from the octave itself (which is assumed to be just). There are other less standard terms, many in the Tonalsoft Encyclopedia. More generally, the term ed-p can be used, where p is any frequency ratio. For example, the equal-tempering of the Bohlen–Pierce scale may be referred to as 13ed3, for 13 equal divisions of 3/1 (the 3rd harmonic).

As the steps are tuned to be equal, equal scales may be taken to close anywhere composers wish them to. Barring the convention of closing equal divisions of particular just intervals at those stated just intervals, there are infinite synonymous names for each equal scale.

As there are infinitely many intervals, there are infinitely many equal scales. Barring technicalities, there are large quantities of perceivably different equal scales. Seeing such a diverse menagerie at their disposal, some composers choose to combine multiple equal tunings sequentially or simultaneously.

An equal-step tuning is an arithmetic and harmonotonic tuning. In terms of what musical resource is divided, it divides pitch, so another term for equal-step tuning is equal pitch division (EPD). Since pitch is the most commonly divided resource, this can be shortened to just equal division (ED).

Formula

To find the step size of n-ed-p in terms of cents, divide the cents of p by n. The size s of k steps of n-ed-p (k\n <p>) is

[math]\displaystyle{ \displaystyle s = 1200 \log_2 (p) \cdot k/n }[/math]

To find the step size of n-edo in terms of frequency ratio, take the n-th root of p. For example, the step of 12edo is 21/12 (≈ 1.059). So the ratio c of k steps of n-ed-p is

[math]\displaystyle{ \displaystyle c = p^{k/n} }[/math]

In particular, when k is 0, c is simply 1, because any number to the 0th power is 1. And when k = n, c is simply p, because any number to the 1st power is itself.

Lookalike equal divisions

What do 12ed2, 19ed3, and 28ed5 all have in common? They are all approximately the same scale. This happens because 12ed2 is an accurate temperament (for its size) that contains relatively close approximations of 3/1 and 5/1. In contrast, 11ed2 does not correspond closely to any equal division of 3/1 or 5/1.

The following plot shows equal divisions of 2/1, 3/1, 5/1, and 7/1, and points out some instances when three or more of them happen to be close together. Note that any equal division of 2/1 is automatically an equal division of 4/1; and if something is simultaneously a good equal division of both 2/1 and 3/1, then it is a good equal division of 6/1 as well.

equal.png

(Unlimited resolution version: equal.svg)

For the mathematically inclined, this kind of diagram is closely related to the Riemann zeta function.

Catalog of equal-step tunings

Equal divisions

Includes Edp for p with a Wilson height ≤ 10 and integer limit ≤ 8 (plus some extras due to strong consensus for their inclusion).
  • Ed9/8 (… of the major whole tone)
  • Ed6/5 (… of the classic minor third)
  • Ed5/4 (… of the classic major third)
  • Ed4/3 (… of the perfect fourth)





  • Ed9/4 (… of the 3-limit major ninth)
  • Ed7/3 (… of the septimal minor tenth)
  • Ed5/2 (… of the classic major tenth)
  • Ed8/3 (… of the perfect eleventh)
  • Ede (… of acoustic e)



  • Ed7/2 (… of the septimal minor fourteenth)
  • Ed4 (… of the double octave, 4/1)
  • Ed5 (… of the 5th harmonic)
  • Ed6 (… of the 6th harmonic)
  • Ed7 (… of the 7th harmonic)
  • Ed8 (… of the 8th harmonic)
  • Ed12 (… of the 12th harmonic)


Equal multiplications

An equal multiplication of a rational interval can also be called an ambitonal sequence (AS). For example, the 25/24 equal-step tuning could also be written AS25/24.

An equal multiplication of an irrational interval can also be called an arithmetic pitch sequence (APS). For example, the 65-cents equal-step tuning could also be written APS65¢.

The union of both is equivalent to the unity division of a target interval. For example, AS25/24 is 1ed25/24, and APS65¢ is 1ed65¢.

List of notable AS

List of notable APS

Edonoi

An equal division of a non-octave interval (EDONOI or edonoi) is a tuning obtained by dividing a non-octave interval in a certain number of equal steps. In a broader sense, any equal-step tuning that is not an integer edo is an edonoi.

The most often used edonoi include the equal-tempering of the Bohlen–Pierce scale (i.e. 13 equal divisions of 3), the Phoenix tuning, tunings of Carlos Alpha, Beta, and Gamma, the 19 equal divisions of 3, the 6 equal divisions of 3/2, the 2 equal divisions of 13/10, and 88cET. Other strong edonoi include 69ed7 and 143ed11, respectively very accurate in the 3.5.7.11.13 subgroup and the 5.7.8.9.11.13.17.23 subgroup. For a more extensive gallery, see the #Equal divisions section above.

Some edonoi contain an interval close to 2/1 that might function like a stretched or squashed octave – those edonoi can thus be considered variations on edos.

Other edonoi contain no approximation of an octave or a compound octave (at least, not for a while), and continue generating new tones as they continue upward or downward. Such scales lack a very familiar compositional redundancy, that of octave equivalence – this might necessitate special attention.

See also

External links