Talk:Subgroup temperament families, relationships, and genes: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) |
Re |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC) | :: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
== "Gene" vs step of 311? == | |||
Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) | |||
:: I don't think these are similar enough types of concepts as to cause conflicts. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 16:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC) | |||